In September 2017 I wrote about the failure of my Exped Synmat UL 9
while walking the Isle of Wight Coast Path.
I had purchased the Synmat sleeping mat back in 2014 just after my
partner, Susan, had purchased one because I was so impressed with the
one that she had bought and wanted the same thing.
At the time I wrote the article I had been pleasantly surprised by
the customer service provided by Amazon who contacted the UK distributor
for Exped and between them they arranged for a credit which I used to
purchase the newer version of the same product.
Now, here we are in July 2018 and my partners Exped Synmat UL 9
sleeping mat has developed exactly the same problem.
However, when we contacted the retailer that she had purchased hers
from, Ultralight Outdoor Gear, we received an email back saying that
they would not be able to send the items back to Exped for a credit.
Undeterred, we contacted Lyon directly and explained the situation
and pointed out that we had received a credit for the one purchased
through Amazon.
Lyon replied apologising for issues that we had had with the Exped
products and went on to explain “We have had some isolated instances of
this happening as a consequence of moisture entering the mat, which then
results in a baffle failure through a process of hydrolysis. Given that
the item is two years outside of the warranty period, we would be unable
to help you out in this instance.”
So, there you have it, it is our fault for allowing moisture to enter
the mat. Really? How does that happen then?
We have always used the snozzle bag to inflate the mats and they have
never been exposed to rain or water directly.
I would also argue that you could hardly consider two Synmats
purchased from two separate retailers suffering identical failures as
‘isolated’. To me, that sounds more like a “faulty batch” and I have
heard many more similar instances since posting the first article. Some
of which had successful outcomes from Lyon and some of which did
not.
So, what are we to learn from all this? Well, if nothing else, we had
a much better response when the retailer concerned was the online
retailing giant Amazon as opposed to the small, independent and
specialist retailer Ultralight Outdoor Gear so is it that we should
steer clear of indpendant retailers in future because they don’t seem to
have enough influence on the distributors or manufacturers?
If so, then that is a very sad lesson indeed.